Nerman Fatic vs Lucas Miedler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Miedler analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Lucas Miedler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 0 Miedler
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 49.45% of points on their second serve, while Miedler has won 53.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 42.92% of their opponent's second serve points, while Miedler has won 47.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.08% and 27.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 58.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Miedler has saved 53.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 35/ 30), with Miedler winning 44.44% (W/L 4/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 281/ 192), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Miedler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 181/ 76), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 22/ 20), where as Miedler has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 2/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fatic winning 2 times and Miedler being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Fatic winning 4 and Miedler winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Miedler was at the Como Challenger, 31-08-2022, Second, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Miedler have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Miedler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Miedler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 279.17 while Miedler has played against players with an average rank of 299.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Miedler has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 35.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Miedler has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
220
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
201
High
27
Age
R
Plays
10
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
Form
57% (341-255)
Career Total W/L
60% (339-228)
40% (8-12)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$43,270
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nerman Fatic | Lucas Miedler |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 24 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:26:37 | 1:26:37 |
1st Serve % | 70% (82/117) | 58% (59/101) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (58/82) | 63% (37/59) |
2nd Serve Win% | 57% (20/35) | 50% (21/42) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 14% (1/7) |
Return Points W% | 43% (43/101) | 33% (39/117) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Lucas Miedler
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
6-3 6-3 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Lucas Miedler
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nerman Fatic | Lucas Miedler |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (8/12) | 50% (3/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (20/26) | 50% (8/8) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (206/231) | 49% (80/82) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 31% (4/9) | 40% (2/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.27 |
Aces Total | 92 | 22 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.14 |
DFs Total | 43 | 11 |
Avg Match Time | 1:35:25 | 1:36:24 |
Avg Opp Rank | 312.75 | 253.17 |
1st Serve % | 64% (807/1258) | 57% (232/406) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (560/807) | 69% (159/232) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (223/451) | 53% (93/174) |
BPs Won% Total | 35% (35/99) | 40% (12/30) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (469/1307) | 36% (143/395) |
Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 33% (1/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (8/19) | 50% (3/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 50% (2/4) |
1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 50% (4/2) |
1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 50% (4/2) |
1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 50% (2/1) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Lucas Miedler Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Lucas Miedler
45%
(
45 of
99)
1st Serve %
42%
(
48 of
114)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
63%
(
34 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
114)
106
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lucas Miedler
Player
Jelle Sels
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Francesco Passaro
Player
Lucas Miedler
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Fabio Fognini
Player
Lucas Miedler
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lucas Miedler
Player
Matteo Martineau
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Rubber 4 | 6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Lucas Miedler
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
9
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
0
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lucas Miedler
Player
Neil Oberleitner
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Lucas Miedler
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
36 of
78)
19
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
7
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicolas Barrientos
Player
Lucas Miedler
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more